MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,346 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,346 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 19 of 67

Labels cover 3 of 3,346 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,346 of 3,346 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Inflationary string theory?
2004· article· en· Pramana· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
affunlabeled
Quintessence from shape moduli
Marco Peloso, Erich Poppitz
2003· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
affunlabeled
Towards Early Dark Energy in string theory
Evan McDonough, Marco Scalisi
2023· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Bardeen compact stars in modified f(G) gravity
Adnan Malik, Mushtaq Ahmad, Basem Al Alwan, Zahra Naeem
2022· article· en· Canadian Journal of Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Cosmological moduli dynamics
Brian Greene, Simon Judes, Janna Levin, Scott Watson, Amanda Weltman
2007· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
affunlabeled
Radiation bounce from the Lee-Wick construction?
Johanna Karouby, Robert Brandenberger
2010· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Laboratory constraints
Philippe Brax, Anne-Christine Davis
2018· article· en· International Journal of Modern Physics D· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affunlabeled
Non-Gaussianity from axionic curvaton
Masahiro Kawasaki, Takeshi Kobayashi, Fuminobu Takahashi
2013· article· en· Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affunlabeled
Dark matter trigger for early dark energy coincidence
Mengxiang Lin, Evan McDonough, J. Colin Hill, Wayne Hu
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affunlabeled
Cosmological perturbations on a bouncing brane
Robert Brandenberger, Hassan Firouzjahi, Omid Saremi
2007· article· en· Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affunlabeled
SOLAR SYSTEM TESTS OF f(R) GRAVITY
2014· article· en· International Journal of Modern Physics D· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
affunlabeled
Primordial magnetic helicity constraints from WMAP nine-year data
Tina Kahniashvili, Yurii Maravin, George Lavrelashvili, Arthur Kosowsky
2014· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
afffundunlabeled
The density structure of supersonic self-gravitating turbulence
Shivan Khullar, Christoph Federrath, Mark R. Krumholz, Christopher D. Matzner
2021· article· en· Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
32
citations
affunlabeled
[no title]
2018· article· en· Cronfa (Swansea University)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
32
citations
afffundunlabeled
Nonlinear dynamical stability of infrared modifications of gravity
Richard Brito, Alexandra Terrana, Matthew C. Johnson, Vítor Cardoso
2014· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
32
citations
affunlabeled
Optimal filters for detecting cosmic bubble collisions
Jason D. McEwen, Stephen M. Feeney, Matthew C. Johnson, Hiranya V. Peiris
2012· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
32
citations
afffundunlabeled
Limited accuracy of linearized gravity
John T. Giblin, James B. Mertens, Glenn D. Starkman, Chi Tian
2019· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
32
citations
affunlabeled
Inflationary String Theory?
2004· article· en· CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
32
citations
afffundunlabeled
Observational constraints on early dark energy
Evan McDonough, J. Colin Hill, Mikhail M. Ivanov, Adrien La Posta, Michael W. Toomey
2024· article· en· International Journal of Modern Physics D· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
32
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About