MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Data Visualization and Analytics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,448 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,448 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 29

Labels cover 4 of 1,448 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,448 of 1,448 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Rethinking Visualization: A High-Level Taxonomy
Melanie Tory, Torsten Möller
2005· article· en· IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
135
citations
fundaboutno affunlabeled
Four Experiments on the Perception of Bar Charts
Justin Talbot, Vidya Setlur, Anushka Anand
2014· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
132
citations
afffundunlabeled
Theoretical analysis of uncertainty visualizations
Torre Zuk, Sheelagh Carpendale
2006· article· en· Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
130
citations
afffundunlabeled
Authoring Data-Driven Videos with DataClips
Fereshteh Amini, Nathalie Henry Riche, Bongshin Lee, Andrés Monroy‐Hernández, Pourang Irani
2016· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
126
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Perceptual Guidelines for Creating Rectangular Treemaps
Nan Kong, Jeffrey Heer, Maneesh Agrawala
2010· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
111
citations
affunlabeled
The Aesthetics of Graph Visualization
C.J. Bennett, Jody Ryall, Leo Spalteholz, Amy A. Gooch
2007· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
105
citations
affunlabeled
What is Interaction for Data Visualization?
Evanthia Dimara, Charles Périn
2019· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
105
citations
affunlabeled
Rapid sampling for visualizations with ordering guarantees
Albert Kim, Eric Blais, Aditya Parameswaran, Piotr Indyk, Samuel Madden, Ronitt Rubinfeld
2015· article· en· Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
102
citations
affunlabeled
A Comparison of User-Generated and Automatic Graph Layouts
Tim Dwyer, Bongshin Lee, Danyel Fisher, Krystle Quinn, Petra Isenberg, George Robertson +1 more
2009· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
99
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Multivariate Data Analysis
Vishal Kumar
2024· book-chapter· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
96
citations
affunlabeled
The nested blocks and guidelines model
Miriah Meyer, Michael Sedlmair, P. Samuel Quinan, Tamara Munzner
2013· article· en· Information Visualization· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
92
citations
affunlabeled
Visual Thinking In Action: Visualizations As Used On Whiteboards
Jagoda Walny, Sheelagh Carpendale, Nathalie Henry Riche, Gina Venolia, Phil Fawcett
2011· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
92
citations
affunlabeled
A Brief History of the Mosaic Display
Michael Friendly
2002· article· en· Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
92
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
A Novel Visualization Technique for Electric Power Grid Analytics
Pak Chung Wong, Kevin P. Schneider, Patrick Mackey, H.P. Foote, G. Chin, Ross Guttromson +1 more
2008· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
92
citations
affunlabeled
Exploratory Analysis of Time-Series with ChronoLenses
Jian Zhao, Fanny Chevalier, Emmanuel Pietriga, Ravin Balakrishnan
2011· article· en· IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
90
citations
affunlabeled
Gameplay analysis through state projection
Erik Andersen, Yun-En Liu, Ethan Apter, François Boucher-Genesse, Zoran Popović
2010· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
86
citations
affunlabeled
Line graph explorer
Robert Kincaid, Heidi Lam
2006· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
82
citations
affunlabeled
Highlighting interventions and user differences
Giuseppe Carenini, Cristina Conati, Enamul Hoque, Ben Steichen, Dereck Toker, James T. Enns
2014· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
82
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About