MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Advances in Health Sciences Education
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

539 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
539 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 11

Labels cover 4 of 539 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 539 of 539 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Validity: one word with a plurality of meanings
Christina St‐Onge, Meredith Young, Kevin W. Eva, Brian Hodges
2016· article· en· Advances in Health Sciences Education· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
87
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Script concordance testing: more cases or more questions?
Robert Gagnon, Bernard Charlin, Carole Lambert, Benoit Carrière, Cees van der Vleuten
2008· article· en· Advances in Health Sciences Education· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
66
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Cognitive elements in clinical decision-making
Bruce C. Dunphy, Robert Cantwell, Sid Bourke, Mark T. Fleming, Bruce R. Smith, K.S. Joseph +1 more
2009· article· en· Advances in Health Sciences Education· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
64
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Assessing Tutorial-Based Assessment
Kevin W. Eva
2001· article· en· Advances in Health Sciences Education· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
60
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Salami-slicing and plagiarism: How should we respond?
Martin G. Tolsgaard, Rachel Ellaway, Geoff Norman
2019· editorial· en· Advances in Health Sciences Education· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · research_integrityconsensus · none
50
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About