MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Methods
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

255 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
255 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 6

Labels cover 0 of 255 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 255 of 255 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Latex allergy: historical perspective
Gordon L. Sussman, Donald H. Beezhold, Gary M. Liss
2002· article· en· Methods· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
51
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Assays for cytokines using aptamers
Jeffrey Guthrie, Camille Hamula, H ZHANG, X. Chris Le
2006· review· en· Methods· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
51
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Identification of unknown RNA partners using MAPS
David Lalaouna, Karine Prévost, Alex Eyraud, Éric Massé
2016· article· en· Methods· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
43
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Quantifying biased signaling in GPCRs using BRET-based biosensors
Yoon Namkung, Olivier Radresa, Sylvain Armando, Dominic Devost, Alexandre Beautrait, Christian Le Gouill +1 more
2015· article· en· Methods· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
41
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Chemical probes for protein arginine methyltransferases
Alice Shi Ming Li, Fengling Li, Mohammad S. Eram, Albina Bolotokova, Carlo C. dela Seña, Masoud Vedadi
2019· review· en· Methods· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
35
citations
afffundunlabeled
In-line probing of RNA G-quadruplexes
Jean-Denis Beaudoin, Rachel Jodoin, Jean‐Pierre Perreault
2013· article· en· Methods· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Real-time luminescence imaging of cellular ATP release
Kishio Furuya, Masahiro Sokabe, Ryszard Grygorczyk
2013· article· en· Methods· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
32
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About