MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Nuclear Physics B
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

149 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
149 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 2 of 3

Labels cover 0 of 149 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 149 of 149 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Logarithmic lift of the (2) model
Frédéric Lesage, Pierre Mathieu, Jørgen Rasmussen, Hubert Saleur
2004· article· en· Nuclear Physics B· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
42
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Matching QCD and HQET heavy–light currents at three loops
Stefan Bekavac, Andrey Grozin, Peter Marquard, Jan Piclum, Dirk Seidel, Matthias Steinhauser
2010· article· en· Nuclear Physics B· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Three-loop on-shell Feynman integrals with two masses
Stefan Bekavac, Andrey Grozin, Dirk Seidel, Vladimir A. Smirnov
2009· article· en· Nuclear Physics B· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
afffundunlabeled
Bethe ansätze for GKP strings
Benjamin Basso, Adam Rej
2013· article· de· Nuclear Physics B· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
34
citations
31
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Symmetry and entropy of black hole horizons
Olaf Dreyer, Fotini Markopoulou, Lee Smolin
2006· article· en· Nuclear Physics B· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Four-dimensional CDT with toroidal topology
J. Ambjørn, J. Gizbert-Studnicki, A. Görlich, Kevin T. Grosvenor, J. Jurkiewicz
2017· article· en· Nuclear Physics B· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
28
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Decomposing quantum fields on branes
Marco Bertola, J. Bros, Vittorio Gorini, Ugo Moschella, R. Schaeffer
2000· article· en· Nuclear Physics B· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
afffundunlabeled
Neutrino oscillation studies with IceCube-DeepCore
M. G. Aartsen, K. Abraham, M. Ackermann, J. Adams, J. A. Aguilar, M. Ahlers +299 more
2016· article· en· Nuclear Physics B· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Cosmological monopoles and non-Abelian black holes
Yves Brihaye, Betti Hartmann, Eugen Radu, Cristian Stelea
2006· article· en· Nuclear Physics B· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A note on Wilson–ʼt Hooft operators
Natalia Saulina
2011· article· en· Nuclear Physics B· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About