MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,781 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,781 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 21 of 56

Labels cover 13 of 2,781 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,781 of 2,781 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Close Margins Less Than 2 mm Are Not Associated With Higher Risks of 10-Year Local Recurrence and Breast Cancer Mortality Compared With Negative Margins in Women Treated With Breast-Conserving Therapy
Susan A. Tyler, Pauline T. Truong, Mary Lesperance, Alan Nichol, Chris Baliski, Rebecca Warburton +1 more
2018· article· en· International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
affunlabeled
Review of the Clinical Studies Using the 21-Gene Assay
Catherine M. Kelly, Ellen Warner, Daphne Tsoi, Sunil Verma, Kathleen I. Pritchard
2010· review· en· The Oncologist· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Breast Tumor-Bed Biopsy for Pathological Complete Response Prediction
Mark Basik, Reena S. Cecchini, Jennifer De Los Santos, Heidi Umphrey, Thomas B. Julian, Eleftherios P. Mamounas +16 more
2025· letter· en· JAMA Surgery· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Adoption of Surgical Innovations
Frances C. Wright, Anna R. Gagliardi, Novlette Fraser, May Lynn Quan
2011· article· en· Surgical Innovation· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
affunlabeled
Benefits and Harms of Detecting Clinically Occult Breast Cancer
Eitan Amir, Philippe L. Bédard, Alberto Ocaña, Boštjan Šeruga
2012· article· en· JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About