MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Journal of High Energy Physics
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,246 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,246 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 22 of 65

Labels cover 2 of 3,246 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,246 of 3,246 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Charged fermions below 100 GeV
2018· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
43
citations
afffundunlabeled
Holographic Lorentz and Carroll frames
Andrea Campoleoni, Luca Ciambelli, Arnaud Delfante, Charles Marteau, P. Marios Petropoulos, Romain Ruzziconi
2022· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
43
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Superluminality in DGP
Kurt Hinterbichler, Alberto Nicolis, Massimo Porrati
2009· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
43
citations
afffundunlabeled
Eikonal approximation in celestial CFT
Leonardo Pipolo de Gioia, Ana-Maria Raclariu
2023· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
43
citations
afffundunlabeled
Van Der Waals black holes in d dimensions
Térence Delsate, Robert B. Mann
2015· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
42
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Recursion relation for general 3d blocks
Rajeev S. Erramilli, Luca V. Iliesiu, Petr Kravchuk
2019· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
42
citations
afffundunlabeled
Towards the cold atom analog false vacuum
Jonathan Braden, Matthew C. Johnson, Hiranya V. Peiris, Silke Weinfurtner
2018· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
42
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Baryonic generating functions
2007· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
42
citations
affunlabeled
The leading trajectory in the 2+1D Ising CFT
Simon Caron-Huot, Yan Gobeil, Zahra Zahraee
2023· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
42
citations
afffundunlabeled
On the need for soft dressing
Daniel Carney, Laurent Chaurette, Dominik Neuenfeld, Gordon W. Semenoff
2018· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
42
citations
affunlabeled
NNLO QCD corrections to event shapes at the LHC
Manuel Alvarez, J. Cantero, M. Czakon, Alexander Mitov, René Poncelet
2023· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
41
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Time-dependent warping, fluxes, and NCYM
Keshav Dasgupta, Govindan Rajesh, Daniel Robbins, Savdeep Sethi
2003· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
41
citations
affunlabeled
Light resonances and the low-q2 bin of $$ {R}_{K^{*}} $$
Wolfgang Altmannshofer, Michael J. Baker, Stefania Gori, Roni Harnik, Maxim Pospelov, Emmanuel Stamou +1 more
2018· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
41
citations
afffundunlabeled
Dark photon vortex formation and dynamics
William E. East, Junwu Huang
2022· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
41
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Minimal models with light sterile neutrinos
A. Donini, Pilar Hernández, J. López-Pavón, Michele Maltoni
2011· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
41
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About