MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Esophageal Cancer Research and Treatment
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,229 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,229 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 24 of 25

Labels cover 5 of 1,229 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,229 of 1,229 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Left Thoracoabdominal Esophagectomy
Lorenzo Ferri, Luis M. Castro
2025· book-chapter· en· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Response
Anand V. Sahai
2001· article· en· Gastrointestinal Endoscopy· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
THE AUTHORS REPLY
Marie‐Claude Rousseau, Marie‐Élise Parent, Louise Nadon, Benoit Latreille, Jack Siemiatycki
2008· article· en· American Journal of Epidemiology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Reply to Moor et al. and Egashira et al.
Anna J. Podolanczuk, Gary M. Hunninghake, David A. Schwartz, Christopher J. Ryerson
2025· article· en· American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Intensive care unit utilization after esophagectomy
David R. Brown, Francis X. Whalen, Tuhin K. Roy, Stephen D. Cassivi, Mark T. Keegan
2007· article· en· Critical Care· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The PROWESS SHOCK trial: reply to Paramesh et al.
Simon Finfer, V. Marco Ranieri, Bruce Thompson, Philip S. Barie, Jean-François Dhainaut, Ivor S. Douglas +3 more
2009· article· en· Intensive Care Medicine· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About