MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Reflective Practices in Education
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,442 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,442 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 24 of 29

Labels cover 9 of 1,442 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,442 of 1,442 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Learning Posts
June Countryman
2012· article· International journal of education and the arts· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
So you want to write a textbook?
Philip H. Gordon
2000· article· en· Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
What is success?
Kiyu Itoi
2018· article· en· SFU Educational Review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Meaningful Research Projects
Lois Barranoik
2021· article· en· IASL Annual Conference Proceedings· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Do This Article
Meredith Barrett
2020· article· en· Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Some Pedagogical Reflections
Freya Kodar
2012· article· en· Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Four Handouts
Ethan Philbrick
2023· article· en· Performance Matters· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Call
Carol Whiteman
2017· article· en· SFU Educational Review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
Call For Book Review Editor
Theodore Michael Christou, Christopher DeLuca
2014· article· en· Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Biographical Explorations through Creative Work
Heather McLeod, Morgan Gardner, Elizabeth Yeoman
2016· article· en· Canadian Review of Art Education Research and Issues / Revue canadienne de recherches et enjeux en éducation artistique· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About