MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
European and International Law Studies
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,396 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,396 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 25 of 28

Labels cover 1 of 1,396 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,396 of 1,396 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
No Reinforcements from Quebec
2017· book-chapter· en· MQUP eBooks· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Ukraine
2021· book-chapter· en· OECD/G20 base erosion and profit shifting project· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
No. 17725. Canada and Romania
2001· book-chapter· en· United Nations Treaty Series· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
2016. 01. 002. Смит Д. Согласие и несогласие в праве. Smith D. agreement and disagreement in law // Canadian Journal of law and jurisprudence. - Cambridge, 2015. - vol. 28, n 1. - p. 183-208
К Ф Загоруйко
2016· article· ru· Социальные и гуманитарные науки. Отечественная и зарубежная литература. Сер. 4, Государство и право: Реферативный журнал· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
No. 50327. European Community and Canada
2019· book-chapter· en· United Nations Treaty Series· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Abbot should take the Canadian lead on free speech
Aaron Lane
2014· article· en· Institute of Public Affairs Review: A Quarterly Review of Politics and Public Affairs, The· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
No. 44325. Canada and Croatia
2011· book-chapter· en· United Nations Treaty Series· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Chapter 21: Poland
K. Tetłak
2016· book-chapter· en· EC and international tax law series.· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Chapter 23: Sweden
A. Arfwidsson
2022· book-chapter· en· EC and international tax law series.· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Die Entscheidung des EuGH im Fall Tetra Laval
Jörg Nothdurft
2006· article· de· Zeitschrift für Wettbewerbsrecht· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Vancouver-gruppen møttes i Oslo
Lise B. Johannessen
2006· article· no· Tidsskrift for Den Norske Laegeforening· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
10.1016/0967-0653(96)85401-9
2000· article· en· Time to knit· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
No. 35976. United Nations and Canada
2002· book-chapter· en· United Nations Treaty Series· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
No. 41347. Canada and Estonia
2012· book-chapter· en· United Nations Treaty Series· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
No. 34221. Austria and Canada
2001· book-chapter· en· United Nations Treaty Series· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The role of the courts in the 1980s
L.J. Diplock
2010· article· en· Open Collections· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About