MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,936 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,936 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 26 of 79

Labels cover 5 of 3,936 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,936 of 3,936 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Modular Spacetime and Metastring Theory
Laurent Freidel, Robert G. Leigh, Djordje Minić
2017· article· en· Journal of Physics Conference Series· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations
afffundunlabeled
Yang-Mills glueballs as closed bosonic strings
Sergei Dubovsky, Guzmán Hernández-Chifflet
2017· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations
affunlabeled
Violation of the holographic bulk viscosity bound
Alex Buchel
2012· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations
afffundunlabeled
Complexity=anything: singularity probes
Eivind Jørstad, Robert C. Myers, Shan-Ming Ruan
2023· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
On bubbles of nothing in AdS/CFT
Jianyang He, Moshe Rozali
2007· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Conical defects in higher spin theories
2012· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations
afffundunlabeled
Study of highly excited string states at the Large Hadron Collider
D. M. Gingrich, Kevin Martell
2008· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations
affunlabeled
Two aspects of black hole entropy in Lanczos-Lovelock models of gravity
Sanved Kolekar, Dawood Kothawala, Τ. Padmanabhan
2012· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations
afffundunlabeled
Dual computations of non-Abelian Yang-Mills theories on the lattice
J. Wade Cherrington, J. Daniel Christensen, Igor Khavkine
2007· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Symmetry and entropy of black hole horizons
Olaf Dreyer, Fotini Markopoulou, Lee Smolin
2006· article· en· Nuclear Physics B· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
30
citations
afffundunlabeled
Overtones and nonlinearities in binary black hole ringdowns
Matthew Giesler, Sizheng Ma, Keefe Mitman, Naritaka Oshita, Saul A. Teukolsky, Michael Boyle +8 more
2025· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
afffundunlabeled
On the Genus Distribution of $(p,q,n)$-Dipoles
Terry I. Visentin, Susana Wieler
2007· article· en· The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
fundno affunlabeled
A compendium of logarithmic corrections in AdS/CFT
Nikolay Bobev, Marina David, Junho Hong, Valentin Reys, Xuao Zhang
2024· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
afffundunlabeled
Interior of distorted black holes
Valeri P. Frolov, Andrey A. Shoom
2007· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Strings in Gravimagnetic Fields
Yeuk-Kwan E. Cheung, Laurent Freidel, Konstantin Savvidy
2004· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Super-Entropic Black Holes
Robert B. Mann
2018· book-chapter· en· Springer proceedings in physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
affunlabeled
Localization and real Jacobi forms
Sujay K. Ashok, Nima Doroud, Jan Troost
2016· article· en· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
afffundunlabeled
Non-relativistic scale anomalies
2016· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
afffundunlabeled
Penrose inequality in anti–de Sitter space
Viqar Husain, Suprit Singh
2017· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
affunlabeled
Are “Superentropic” black holes superentropic?
Michael Appels, Leopoldo Cuspinera, Ruth Gregory, Pavel Krtouš, David Kubizňák
2020· article· en· Durham Research Online (Durham University)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
affunlabeled
Thermal correlation functions of KdV charges in 2D CFT
Alexander Maloney, Gim Seng Ng, Simon F. Ross, Ioannis Tsiares
2019· article· en· Durham Research Online (Durham University)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
affunlabeled
Classification of QCD defects via holography
A. Gorsky, V.I. Zakharov, Ariel Zhitnitsky
2009· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About