MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,232 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,232 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 26 of 45

Labels cover 8 of 2,232 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,232 of 2,232 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affvenueunlabeled
Not safer and not cheaper?
Amiram Gafni, Mary E. Hannah, R Palencia
2006· article· en· Canadian Medical Association Journal· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Who's choosing caesarean section?
Carol Kingdon, Tina Lavender, Gillian ML Gyte, Ruth Cattrell, Vicky Singleton, James Nielson
2003· article· en· British Journal of Midwifery· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Elective cesarean section
M. E. Hannah
2004· article· en· Canadian Medical Association Journal· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
4
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Trial of labour after caesarean delivery
Elizabeth Miazga, Eliane M. Shore
2022· article· en· Canadian Medical Association Journal· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affunlabeled
Risk for and temporal trends in cesarean surgical complications
Timothy Wen, Lillian Liao, Adina R. Kern‐Goldberger, Jean Guglielminotti, Cynthia Gyamfi‐Bannerman, Jason D. Wright +2 more
2021· article· en· The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
2000: Year of the Breech
Michael Helewa
2001· article· en· Journal SOGC· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Reply
Emmanuel Bujold, Stéphanie Roberge
2015· letter· en· American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About