MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,645 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,645 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 26 of 53

Labels cover 6 of 2,645 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,645 of 2,645 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Tolman type VII solution, trapped null orbits, and<i>w</i>-modes
Nicholas Neary, Mustapha Ishak, Kayll Lake
2001· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
afffundunlabeled
Bounds on the bubble wall velocity
Wen-Yuan Ai, Benoit Laurent, Jorinde van de Vis
2025· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
(Anomalous) X-ray Pulsars
2004· article· en· Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
afffundunlabeled
Multioscillating Boson Stars
Matthew W. Choptuik, Ramon Masachs, Benson Way
2019· article· en· Physical Review Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Runaway relaxion from finite density
Reuven Balkin, Javi Serra, Konstantin Springmann, Stefan Stelzl, Andreas Weiler
2022· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
affunlabeled
Giant Pulses in Millisecond Pulsars
B. C. Joshi, M. Krämer, A. G. Lyne, M. A. McLaughlin, I. H. Stairs
2004· article· en· Symposium - International Astronomical Union· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
affunlabeled
The Perseus Arm Pulsar Survey
M. Burgay, M. J. Keith, D. R. Lorimer, T. E. Hassall, A. G. Lyne, F. Camilo +8 more
2012· article· en· Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
affunlabeled
Strong-field tests of gravity with the double pulsar
M. Krämer, I. H. Stairs, R. N. Manchester, M. A. McLaughlin, A. G. Lyne, R. D. Ferdman +8 more
2005· article· en· Annalen der Physik· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About