MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,799 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,799 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 27 of 36

Labels cover 1 of 1,799 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,799 of 1,799 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

aboutno affunlabeled
The Toronto Red-Sequence Cluster Survey: First Results
Michael D. Gladders, H. K. C. Yee
2000· article· en· CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Convergence Age of the Globular Cluster NGC 6397
Harvey B. Richer, Brad M. S. Hansen, S. Davis, J. P. Anderson, G. G. Fahlman, Jason S. Kalirai +4 more
2006· article· en· NPARC· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
New Nova Candidates from the RSBE M31 Nova Survey
Stephanie Lauber, Travis A. Rector, A. W. Shafter
2015· article· en· American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts #225· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
On Observing Omega Centauri From Canada
Dan Taylor
2001· article· en· JRASC· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Improved model of Delta Orionis
A. Oplištilová, P. Harmanec, P. Mayer, P. Zasche, M. Šlechta, H. Pablo +2 more
2020· article· en· Contributions of the Astronomical Observatory Skalnaté Pleso· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
The Dust Content of a Quarter Million SDSS DR4 Galaxies
J. E. Cabanela, Suhail Sidhu, Wendy Bennett
2005· article· en· American Astronomical Society Meeting Abstracts· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Epilogue: statistics and our Universe
J. V. Wall, Charles Jenkins
2012· book-chapter· en· Cambridge University Press eBooks· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Binary Universe: Cosmic Debris Spotting
Blake Nancarrow
2017· article· en· Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society of Canada· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Exoplanet Science with E-ELT/METIS
Sascha P. Quanz
2014· article· en· European Planetary Science Congress· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
SIGNALS: I. Survey Description
2019· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
affunlabeled
Hot Disks And Delayed Bar Formation
2012· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Occurrence Download
2022· dataset· en· Global Biodiversity Information Facility· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Early-type galaxies in the NOAO Fundamental Plane Survey
Michael J. Hudson, J. R. Lucey, Justin Malecki, S. A. W. Moore, Jenica E. Nelan, Stephen J. Quinney +4 more
2003· article· en· NPARC· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Protoconites minor Chen, Xiao, and Yuan 1994
2020· article· en· Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About