MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,941 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,941 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 28 of 59

Labels cover 3 of 2,941 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,941 of 2,941 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Repetition priming in music.
Sean Hutchins, Caroline Palmėr
2008· article· en· Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Development of the Happy‐Sad Distinction in Music Appreciation
Simone Dalla Bella, Isabelle Peretz, Luc Rousseau, Nathalie Gosselin, Julie Ayotte, Anne Marise Lavoie
2001· article· en· Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations
affunlabeled
Why are natural sounds detected faster than pips?
Clara Suied, Patrick Susini, Stephen McAdams, Roy D. Patterson
2010· article· en· The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
18
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Music: The language of emotion.
Kathleen A. Corrigall, E. Glenn Schellenberg
2013· article· en· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About