MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

604 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
604 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 13

Labels cover 2 of 604 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 604 of 604 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
SCREEN-FILM AND DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY
Arthur G. Haus, Martin J. Yaffe
2000· review· en· Radiologic Clinics of North America· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
48
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Mammographic density
Norman F. Boyd, Lisa J. Martin, Martin J. Yaffe, Salomon Minkin
2009· review· en· Breast Cancer Research· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
39
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Multifocality and Multicentrality in Breast Cancer: Comparison of the Efficiency of Mammography, Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography, and Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Group of Patients with Primarily Operable Breast Cancer
Katarzyna Steinhof-Radwańska, Andrzej Lorek, Michał Holecki, Anna Barczyk-Gutkowska, Anna Grażyńska, Joanna Szczudło-Chraścina +5 more
2021· article· en· Current Oncology· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
35
citations
affunlabeled
Mammographic Breast Density Response to Aromatase Inhibition
Celine M. Vachon, Vera J. Suman, Kathleen R. Brandt, Matthew Kosel, Aman U. Buzdar, Janet E. Olson +8 more
2013· article· en· Clinical Cancer Research· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
33
citations
affunlabeled
Detectors for Digital Mammography
Martin J. Yaffe, James G. Mainprize
2004· review· en· Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment· Medicine
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrowconsensus · none
32
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About