MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,259 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,259 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 26

Labels cover 3 of 1,259 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,259 of 1,259 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

fundno affunlabeled
Who owns the information?
John Orchard
2002· review· en· British Journal of Sports Medicine· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affunlabeled
Tort Reform and Innovation
Alberto Galasso, Hong Luo
2016· report· en· National Bureau of Economic Research· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Professionalism in anesthesia
Homer Yang
2016· review· en· Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Complaints against doctors
Paul Kinnersley, Adrian Edwards
2008· editorial· en· BMJ· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
affaboutunlabeled
Choosing Wisely Canada rhinology recommendations
Neil Arnstead, Yvonne Chan, Shaun Kilty, Ragavan Ganeshathasan, Armin Rahmani, Eric Monteiro
2020· review· en· Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Malpractice: Problems and Solutions
Joseph Bernstein
2013· article· en· Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · research_integrityconsensus · none
13
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Regulating open disclosure: a German perspective
Stuart McLennan, Katja Beitat, Jörg Lauterberg, Jochen Vollmann
2011· article· en· International Journal for Quality in Health Care· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The independent medical examination
Arthur Ameis, Nathan D. Zasler
2002· review· en· Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About