MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

209 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
209 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 5

Labels cover 0 of 209 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 209 of 209 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
The evolutionary ecology of deception
Mikael Mökkönen, Carita Lindstedt
2015· review· en· Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
91
citations
affunlabeled
Pterosaur dietary hypotheses: a review of ideas and approaches
Jordan Bestwick, David M. Unwin, Richard J. Butler, Donald M. Henderson, Mark A. Purnell
2018· review· en· Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
82
citations
affunlabeled
Developmental anatomy of lampreys
Michael K. Richardson, Jeroen Admiraal, Glenda M. Wright
2009· review· en· Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
78
citations
affunlabeled
A review of the osteoderms of lizards (Reptilia: Squamata)
Catherine J. Williams, Alexander Kirby, Arsalan Marghoub, Loïc Kéver, Sonya Ostashevskaya‐Gohstand, Sérgio Bertazzo +5 more
2021· review· en· Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
64
citations
affunlabeled
A synthesis of deimatic behaviour
Eleanor Drinkwater, William L. Allen, John A. Endler, Roger T. Hanlon, Grace G. Holmes, Nicholas T. Homziak +15 more
2022· review· en· Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
62
citations
affunlabeled
What can we teach <i>Lymnaea</i> and what can <i>Lymnaea</i> teach us?
Veronica Rivi, Cristina Benatti, Ken Lukowiak, Chiara Colliva, Silvia Alboni, Fabio Tascedda +1 more
2021· review· en· Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
58
citations
afffundunlabeled
Olfactory camouflage and communication in birds
Leanne A. Grieves, Marc Gilles, Innes C. Cuthill, Tamás Székely, Elizabeth A. MacDougall‐Shackleton, Barbara A. Caspers
2022· review· en· Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
51
citations
affunlabeled
A niche perspective on the range expansion of symbionts
Alexandre Mestre, Robert Poulin, Joaquín Hortal
2019· review· en· Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
50
citations
afffundunlabeled
Animal migration in the Anthropocene: threats and mitigation options
Steven J. Cooke, Morgan L. Piczak, Navinder J. Singh, Susanne Åkesson, Adam T. Ford, Shawan Chowdhury +10 more
2024· article· en· Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
47
citations
affunlabeled
Signalling and sex in the social amoebozoans
Danton H. O’Day, Alexander F. A. Keszei
2011· review· en· Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
45
citations
affunlabeled
Ancient life and moving fluids
Brandt M. Gibson, David Jon Furbish, Imran A. Rahman, M. W. Schmeeckle, Marc Laflamme, Simon A.F. Darroch
2020· review· en· Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society· Earth and Planetary Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
44
citations
afffundunlabeled
Uncertainty about predation risk: a conceptual review
Adam L. Crane, Laurence E A Feyten, Alexyz A. Preagola, Maud C. O. Ferrari, G. E. Brown
2023· review· en· Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
44
citations
affunlabeled
Macroevolution of the plant–hummingbird pollination system
Elisa Barreto, Mannfred M. A. Boehm, Ezgi Ogutcen, Stefan Abrahamczyk, Michael Kessler, Jordi Bascompte +17 more
2024· review· en· Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
40
citations
afffundunlabeled
Fungal endophytes can modulate plant invasion
Nicholas W. Bard, Quentin Cronk, T. Jonathan Davies
2024· review· en· Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
39
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About