MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

114 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
114 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 3 of 3

Labels cover 0 of 114 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 114 of 114 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Corrigendum to “EURL ECVAM genotoxicity and carcinogenicity database of substances eliciting negative results in the Ames test: Construction of the database” [Mutat. Res. 854–855 June–July (2020) 503199]
Federica Madia, David Kirkland, Takeshi Morita, Paul A. White, David Asturiol, Raffaella Corvi
2020· erratum· en· Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Corrigendum to “Identifying germ cell mutagens using OECD test guideline 488 (transgenic rodent somatic and germ cell Gene mutation assays) and integration with somatic cell testing.” [Mutat. Res. 832–833 (2018) 7–18]
Francesco Marchetti, Marilyn J. Aardema, Carol Beevers, Jan van Benthem, Roger Godschalk, Andrew Williams +3 more
2019· erratum· en· Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Significant new developments in genetic toxicology testing
Miroslav Mišík, P. David Josephy, Helga Stopper
2025· editorial· en· Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
Genotoxicity analysis of a flame retardant, aluminum diethylphosphinate
T O L Leoncio, Israel Felzenszwalb, Carlos Fernando Araújo-Lima, Danielle Palma de Oliveira, Daniel Junqueira Dorta, Carolina Ferreira Sampaio +1 more
2024· article· en· Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About