MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,936 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,936 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 30 of 79

Labels cover 5 of 3,936 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,936 of 3,936 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Search for Randall-Sundrum Gravitons with<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mn>1</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:msup><mml:mi>fb</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mn>1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math>of Data from<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mover accent="true"><mml:mi>p</mml:mi><mml:mo>¯</mml:mo></mml:mover></mml:math>Collisions at<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:msqrt><mml:mi>s</mml:mi></mml:msqrt><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>1.96</mml:mn><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mtext> </mml:mtext><mml:mi>TeV</mml:mi></mml:math>
V. M. Abazov, B. Abbott, M. Abolins, B. S. Acharya, M. Adams, T. Adams +533 more
2008· article· lv· Physical Review Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
fundno affunlabeled
<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"><mml:mi>P</mml:mi><mml:mtext>-</mml:mtext><mml:mi>v</mml:mi></mml:math> Criticality of a Specific Black Hole in <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"><mml:mi>f</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">(</mml:mo><mml:mi>R</mml:mi><mml:mo stretchy="false">)</mml:mo></mml:math> Gravity Coupled with Yang-Mills Field
2018· article· en· Advances in High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
affunlabeled
Quasilocal calculation of tidal heating
Ivan Booth, J. D. E. Creighton
2000· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Universal construction of black hole microstates
Ana Climent, Roberto Emparan, Javier M. Magán, Martin Sasieta, Alejandro Vilar López
2024· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Energy Transport for Thick Holographic Branes
Constantin P. Bachas, Stefano Baiguera, Shira Chapman, Giuseppe Policastro, Tal Schwartzman
2023· article· en· Physical Review Letters· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
affunlabeled
RICCI FLOWS AND SOLITONIC pp-WAVES
2006· article· en· International Journal of Modern Physics A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
affunlabeled
Distorted five-dimensional electrically charged black holes
Shohreh Abdolrahimi, Andrey A. Shoom
2014· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
The hierarchy problem and the self-localized Higgs
C. P. Burgess, Claudia de Rham, Leo van Nierop
2008· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
25
citations
affunlabeled
On higher-dimensional dynamics
2002· article· en· Journal of Mathematical Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
affunlabeled
Cosmology at the top of the $\alpha'$ tower
Jerome Quintin, Heliudson Bernardo, Guilherme Franzmann
2021· article· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Gödel space from wrapped M2-branes
Thomas S Levi, Joris Raeymaekers, Dieter Van den Bleeken, Walter Van Herck, Bert Vercnocke
2010· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
afffundunlabeled
Finite charges from the bulk action
Robert McNees, Céline Zwikel
2023· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
affunlabeled
Quantum corrections to a finite temperature BIon
Behnam Pourhassan, Sanjib Dey, Sumeet Chougule, Mir Faizal
2020· article· en· Classical and Quantum Gravity· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
afffundunlabeled
Hairy black hole chemistry
2019· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
affunlabeled
0704.0955 Charges from Attractors
Nemani V. Suryanarayana, Matthias C. Wapler
2008· article· en· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Lumps in the throat
Keshav Dasgupta, Hassan Firouzjahi, Rhiannon Gwyn
2007· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
affunlabeled
Counterterms, critical gravity, and holography
Kallol Sen, Aninda Sinha, Nemani V. Suryanarayana
2012· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
affunlabeled
BLACK HOLE AREA QUANTIZATION
2002· article· en· Modern Physics Letters A· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Holographic fermionic fixed points in d=3
Joshua L. Davis, Hamid Omid, Gordon W. Semenoff
2011· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
afffundunlabeled
The Wilson loop — large spin OPE dictionary
Carlos Bercini, Vasco Gonçalves, Alexandre Homrich, Pedro Vieira
2022· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About