MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,936 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,936 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 33 of 79

Labels cover 5 of 3,936 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,936 of 3,936 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Spectral Networks and Snakes
Davide Gaiotto, Gregory W. Moore, Andrew Neitzke
2012· preprint· en· arXiv (Cornell University)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Comments on gaugino mass and landscape of vacua
Yuichiro Nakai, Yutaka Ookouchi
2011· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
affunlabeled
Lifshitz Topological Black Holes
Robert B. Mann
2009· preprint· en· ArXiv.org· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Superconformal RG interfaces in holography
Igal Arav, Karen C. Cheung, Jerome P. Gauntlett, Matthew M. Roberts, C. A. Rosen
2020· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
fundno affunlabeled
[no title]
Carlos Cardona, Sunny Guha, Surya Kiran Kanumilli, Kallol Sen
2023· article· en· OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
21
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
The coset D-branes of SU(<i>n</i>)
Matthias R. Gaberdiel, Terry Gannon, Daniel Roggenkamp
2004· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
afffundunlabeled
Scattering amplitudes in affine gravity
Benjamin Knorr, Chris Ripken
2021· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
afffundunlabeled
Carroll fermions
Eric Bergshoeff, Andrea Campoleoni, Andrea Fontanella, Lea Mele, Jan Rosseel
2024· article· en· SciPost Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
fundno affno abstractunlabeled
2d SCFTs from M2-branes
Kentaro Hori, Chan Y. Park, Yuji Tachikawa
2013· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Generally Covariant Actions for Multiple D-branes
Dominic Brecher, Kazuyuki Furuuchi, Henry Ling, Mark Van Raamsdonk
2004· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
afffundunlabeled
Holographic viscoelastic hydrodynamics
2019· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
afffundunlabeled
Carrollian motion in magnetized black hole horizons
Finnian Gray, David Kubizňák, T. Rick Perche, Jaime Redondo–Yuste
2023· article· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
afffundunlabeled
Thermodynamics of two black holes
Pavel Krtouš, Andrei Zelnikov
2020· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
affunlabeled
Driven holographic CFTs
Mukund Rangamani, Moshe Rozali, Anson W. C. Wong
2015· article· en· eScholarship (California Digital Library)· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
afffundunlabeled
Tensor networks for dynamic spacetimes
Alex May
2017· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
afffundunlabeled
Celestial conformal colliders
Yangrui Hu, Sabrina Pasterski
2023· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Oddness from rigidness
Stefan Förste, Ivonne Zavala
2008· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About