MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

940 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
940 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 19

Labels cover 0 of 940 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 940 of 940 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
Towards Computational Rhetoric
Floriana Grasso
2002· article· en· Informal Logic· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Conversational Semantics with Social Commitments
Roberto Antonio Flores, Philippe Pasquier, Brahim Chaib-draa
2005· book-chapter· en· Lecture notes in computer science· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
22
citations
afffundvenueunlabeled
Profiles of Dialogue for Relevance
Douglas Walton, Fabrizio Macagno
2016· article· en· Informal Logic· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Grounding and the expression of belief
Benoît Gaudou, Andreas Herzig, Dominique Longin
2006· preprint· en· HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Conversational semantics sustained by commitments
Roberto A. Flores, Philippe Pasquier, Brahim Chaib-draa
2006· article· en· Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
20
citations
venueno affunlabeled
The Contextuality of Fallacies
Frans H. van Eemeren, Peter Houtlosser
2008· article· en· Informal Logic· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
affunlabeled
Magma: A Foundation Model for Multimodal AI Agents
Jianwei Yang, Reuben Tan, Qianhui Wu, Ruijie Zheng, Baolin Peng, Yongyuan Liang +6 more
2025· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
affunlabeled
On supervising agents in situation-determined ConGolog
Giuseppe De Giacomo, Yves Lespérance, Christian Muise
2012· article· en· IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
afffundunlabeled
UMLtrust
Mohammad Gias Uddin, Mohammad Zulkernine
2008· article· en· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
afffundvenueunlabeled
Formalizing Informal Logic
Douglas Walton, Thomas F. Gordon
2015· article· en· Informal Logic· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Instrumental Rationality
David Hitchcock
2017· book-chapter· en· Argumentation library· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
afffundunlabeled
Objections, Rebuttals and Refutations
Douglas Walton
2009· article· en· Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
affunlabeled
Emotions in Argumentation: an Empirical Evaluation
Mohamed S. Benlamine, Maher Chaouachi, Serena Villata, Elena Cabrio, Claude Frasson, Fabien Gandon
2015· preprint· en· HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Intensional Programming for Agent Communication
V. S. Alagar, Joey Paquet, Kaiyu Wan
2005· book-chapter· en· Lecture notes in computer science· Computer Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About