MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,490 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,490 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 30

Labels cover 4 of 1,490 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,490 of 1,490 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
Approach to M-learning Acceptance Among University Students
Isabel Gómez-Bentancur, Alejandro Valencia-Arías, Laura Duque Cano
2019· article· en· The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
111
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Elements of Open Education: An Invitation to Future Research
Olaf Zawacki‐Richter, Dianne Conrad, Aras Bozkurt, Cengiz Hakan Aydın, Svenja Bedenlier, Insung Jung +19 more
2020· article· en· The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning· Computer Science
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
106
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Pedagogical and Design Aspects of a Blended Learning Course
Karen Precel, Yoram Eshet‐Alkalai, Yael Alberton
2009· article· en· The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
106
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Perceived Service Quality and Student Loyalty in an Online University
María Jesús Martínez Argüelles, Josep-Maria Batalla-Busquets
2016· article· en· The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning· Business, Management and Accounting
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
100
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Best Practices for Online Business Education
Christian Grandzol, John R. Grandzol
2006· article· en· The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
99
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Indicators of Support in Online Interaction
Patrick J. Fahy
2003· article· en· The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
99
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Universal instructional design principles for Moodle
Tanya Elias
2010· article· en· The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning· Social Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
93
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About