MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

257 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
257 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 4 of 6

Labels cover 1 of 257 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 257 of 257 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Normal blindness: when we Look But Fail To See
Jeremy M. Wolfe, Anna Kosovicheva, Benjamin Wolfe
2022· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
49
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Does grasping in patient D.F. depend on vision?
A. David Milner, Tzvi Ganel, Melvyn A. Goodale
2012· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
38
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Moral Goodness Is the Essence of Personal Identity
Julian De Freitas, Mina Cikara, Igor Grossmann, Rebecca J. Schlegel
2018· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
37
citations
fundno affunlabeled
The cognitive (lateral) hypothalamus
Melissa J. Sharpe
2023· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
35
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Emotion in Context: Remembering When
Daniela J. Palombo, Chantelle M. Cocquyt
2020· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
35
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Developmental Topographical Disorientation
Giuseppe Iaria, Ford Burles
2016· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
33
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Effort feels meaningful
Michael Inzlicht, Aidan Vern Campbell
2022· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
31
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Captivity-Induced Depression in Animals
Benjamin Lecorps, Daniel M. Weary, M.A.G. von Keyserlingk
2021· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Veterinary
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
29
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Socially evaluative contexts facilitate mentalizing
Brandon Matthew Woo, Enda Tan, Francis Yuen, J. Kiley Hamlin
2022· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
afffundunlabeled
Quality space computations for consciousness
Stephen M. Fleming, Nicholas Shea
2024· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The pain of altruism
Barbara L. Finlay, Supriya Syal
2014· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The cognitive tenacity of self-directed ageism
Julie D. Henry, Sarah P. Coundouris, Fergus I. M. Craik, Courtney von Hippel, Sarah A. Grainger
2023· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
23
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A 3D framework of implicit attitude change
Benedek Kurdi, Tessa Elizabeth Sadie Charlesworth
2023· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
21
citations
affunlabeled
Toward an understanding of collective intellectual humility
Elizabeth J. Krumrei-Mancuso, Philip Pärnamets, Steven Bland, Mandi Astola, Aleksandra Cichocka, Jeroen de Ridder +7 more
2024· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Torturing the brain
Shane M. O’Mara
2009· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
19
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Thinking outside the ballot box
Thomas H. Costello, Leor Zmigrod, Arber Tasimi
2023· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
17
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
The Trajectory of Self
Timothy Lane, Niall W. Duncan, Tony Cheng, Georg Northoff
2016· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
16
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Toward Studying Cognition in a Dish
Nicolas Rouleau, Nirosha J. Murugan, David L. Kaplan
2021· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
When expert predictions fail
Igor Grossmann, Michael E. W. Varnum, Cendri A. Hutcherson, David R. Mandel
2023· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
15
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Infants and markers: reply to Taylor and Bremner
Tim Bayne, Joel Frohlich, Rhodri Cusack, Julia Moser, Lorina Naçi
2024· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
afffundunlabeled
The interoceptive origin of reinforcement learning
Lilian Weber, Debbie Yee, Dana M. Small, Frederike H. Petzschner
2025· review· en· Trends in Cognitive Sciences· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
14
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About