MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,936 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,936 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 42 of 79

Labels cover 5 of 3,936 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,936 of 3,936 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Mutation, Witten index, and quiver invariant
Heeyeon Kim, Seung–Joo Lee, Piljin Yi
2015· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
fundno affunlabeled
On supersymmetry, boundary actions and brane charges
Lorenzo Di Pietro, Nizan Klinghoffer, Itamar Shamir
2016· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Quasinormal modes of charged regular black hole
L. A. López, Víctor H. Hinojosa
2020· article· en· Canadian Journal of Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A note on Wilson–ʼt Hooft operators
Natalia Saulina
2011· article· en· Nuclear Physics B· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
On unification of RR couplings
É. T. Akhmedov, A. Gerasimov, Samson L. Shatashvili
2001· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
afffundunlabeled
Thermodynamics of charged and accelerating black holes
Tomáš Hale, David Kubizňák, Jana Menšíková, Robert B. Mann, Jiayue Yang
2025· preprint· en· Physical review. D/Physical review. D.· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Black holes as Rubik’s cubes
2011· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
afffundunlabeled
Detector operators for celestial symmetries
Yangrui Hu, Sabrina Pasterski
2023· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
affunlabeled
Perturbations and absorption cross section of infinite-radius black rings
Vítor Cardoso, Óscar J. C. Dias, Shijun Yoshida
2005· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
13
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
SFT on separated D-branes and D-brane translation
Joanna L. Karczmarek, Matheson Longton
2012· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
affunlabeled
Vortices in gauge models at finite density with vector condensates
É. V. Gorbar, Junji Jia, V. A. Miransky
2006· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D, Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
afffundunlabeled
The soaring kite: a tale of two punctured tori
Mathieu Giroux, Andrzej Pokraka, Franziska Porkert, Yoann Sohnle
2024· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
affunlabeled
Radiative falloff in Einstein-Straus spacetime
William G. Laarakkers, Eric Poisson
2001· article· en· Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Dynamical fine tuning in brane inflation
2009· article· en· Journal of High Energy Physics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Quantum field theory and the volume conjecture
JÃ ̧rgen Andersen, Hans Bodén, Atle Hahn, Benjamin Himpel
2011· book-chapter· en· AMS/IP studies in advanced mathematics· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations
affunlabeled
Dyson–Schwinger equations in minimal subtraction
Paul‐Hermann Balduf
2023· article· en· Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré D Combinatorics Physics and their Interactions· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
12
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About