MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Language Development and Disorders
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,803 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,803 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 5 of 37

Labels cover 1 of 1,803 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,803 of 1,803 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
An Alternate MLU Calculation
Judith R. Johnston
2001· article· en· Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
93
citations
affunlabeled
Treatment intensity and childhood apraxia of speech
Aravind Kumar Namasivayam, Margit Pukonen, Debra Goshulak, Jennifer Hard, Frank Rudzicz, Toni Rietveld +3 more
2015· article· en· International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
85
citations
affunlabeled
Emergent morphology
Diana Archangeli, Douglas Pulleyblank
2016· book-chapter· en· Linguistik aktuell· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
85
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Behaviour in Children with Language Development Disorders
Ulrike Willinger, Esther Brunner, Gabriele Diendorfer-Radner, Judith Sams, Ulrike Sirsch, Brigitte Eisenwort
2003· article· en· The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
83
citations
affunlabeled
Bilingual beginnings to learning words
Janet F. Werker, Krista Byers‐Heinlein, Christopher T. Fennell
2009· article· en· Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
82
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Signature tunes in mothers’ speech to infants
Tonya R. Bergeson, Sandra E. Trehub
2007· article· en· Infant Behavior and Development· Psychology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
81
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About