MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Canadian parliamentary review
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,210 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002021
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,210 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 5 of 25

Labels cover 3 of 1,210 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,210 of 1,210 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueaboutno affunlabeled
The New Senate: Still in Transition
George J. Furey
2017· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
The Casting Vote
Maurice Vellacott, J. C. Earnshaw
2003· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Regional Responses to Electoral Reform
R. Kenneth Carty
2006· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Some personal thoughts on question period
Glen J. Pearson
2010· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
The speakership: a New Zealand perspective
Lockwood Smith
2011· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
How India Chooses its Head of State
Vivek Kumar Agnihotri
2012· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Commentary on "Is the United States bankrupt? "
Anjan V. Thakor
2006· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
What the Parliament buildings mean to me
Audrey Moore
2007· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
A survey on the Ontario speakership
Aamir Taiyeb
2009· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Private members and public policy
Linda Jeffrey
2008· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Challenging the chair
Tim R. Mercer
2006· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Empowering Ontario Legislators
Randy Hillier
2013· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About