MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

4,076 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
4,076 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 56 of 82

Labels cover 359 of 4,076 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 4,076 of 4,076 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Randomized clinical trials: Attention to bias
Marion Allen
2002· article· en· Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
2
citations
affunlabeled
CONSORT for Pragmatic Trials
Merrick Zwarenstein
2014· other· en· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
2
citations
affunlabeled
Methods for living evidence synthesis: a systematic review protocol
Ariadna Auladell-Rispau, Josefina Bendersky, Angie Santafe, Cecilia Buchanan, Francisca Verdugo‐Paiva, Camila Ávila +3 more
2021· review· en· Open Research Europe· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
2
citations
aboutno affgemma · metaresearchgpt · metaresearchmodels agree
Guidelines on adequate data reporting
Nadia Elia, Martin R. Tramèr
2012· editorial· en· European Journal of Anaesthesiology· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Writing science that your colleagues can read
Hertzel C. Gerstein
2013· editorial· en· Journal of Diabetes and its Complications· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
2
citations
affvenueunlabeled
Research Methods: Systematic Reviews
Virginia Wilson
2016· article· en· Evidence Based Library and Information Practice· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
2
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Evidence-based endocrinology
R. Brian Haynes, Cynthia J. Walker‐Dilks
2002· review· en· Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
2
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About