MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Nature
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

3,601 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
3,601 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 60 of 73

Labels cover 11 of 3,601 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 3,601 of 3,601 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Pitfalls of coal peak prediction
David W. Keith, Juan Moreno‐Cruz
2011· letter· en· Nature· Energy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractgemma · metaresearch+scholarly_communicationgpt · metaresearch+scholarly_communication+open_sciencemodels split
Preprint clubs: why it takes a village to do peer review
Felix Clemens Richter, Ester Gea‐Mallorquí, Arthur Mortha, Nicolas Ruffin, Nicolas Vabret
2023· article· en· Nature· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Bond villain fails neuroanatomy
Michael D. Cusimano
2015· letter· en· Nature· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Biodiversity: Sharks and rays in peril too
Peter M. Kyne, Nicholas J. Bax, Nicholas K. Dulvy
2015· letter· en· Nature· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
How to turn competitors into collaborators
Erica Ollmann Saphire, John M. Dye, Gary Kobinger, Larry Zeitlin, Kartik Chandran, Robert F. Garry
2017· letter· en· Nature· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Bury botany's outdated image
Isabel Marques
2015· letter· en· Nature· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Feedback throttled down for smooth moves
Stephen H. Scott, Frédéric Crevecoeur
2014· letter· en· Nature· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A balancing act
Janet Rossant
2003· letter· en· Nature· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Link the world's best investigators
Alan Bernstein
2013· article· en· Nature· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Hugh Huxley (1924–2013)
Alan G. Weeds
2013· article· en· Nature· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Cheats never prosper
David T. Mulder, Brian K. Coombes
2013· letter· en· Nature· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Veselka et al. reply
Nina Veselka, David D. McErlain, David W. Holdsworth, Judith L. Eger, Rethy K. Chhem, Matthew J. Mason +3 more
2010· article· en· Nature· Agricultural and Biological Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Vacation reading
Steven Shapin, W. F. Bynum, Michael Shermer, Nicky Clayton, Serge Daan, Hans von Storch +10 more
2010· article· en· Nature· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Thinking laterally about genes
W. Ford Doolittle
2002· article· en· Nature· Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A stockpile of antiviral defences
Sébastien Levesque, Sylvain Moineau
2018· letter· en· Nature· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Speciation far from the madding crowd
Arne Ø. Mooers, Dan A. Greenberg
2018· letter· en· Nature· Environmental Science
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
A monster in the early Universe
2011· article· en· Nature· Physics and Astronomy
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
3
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About