MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Neural dynamics and brain function
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

4,098 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
4,098 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 63 of 82

Labels cover 0 of 4,098 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 4,098 of 4,098 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affunlabeled
Dendritic excitability controls overdispersion
Zachary Friedenberger, Richard Naud
2022· preprint· en· bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
“Value” Emerges from Imperfect Memory
Jorge Ramírez‐Ruiz, R. Becket Ebitz
2024· book-chapter· en· Lecture notes in computer science· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
afffundunlabeled
Collective decision making by embodied neural agents
Nicolas Coucke, Mary Katherine Heinrich, Axel Cleeremans, Marco Dorigo, Guillaume Dumas
2025· article· en· PNAS Nexus· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Introduction
Priscilla E. Greenwood, Lawrence M. Ward
2016· book-chapter· en· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Modeling Time Cell Neuron-Level Dynamics
Mustafa Zeki, Fuat Balcı
2023· article· en· Computational Brain & Behavior· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Quantifying rhythmicity in perceptual reports
Tommaso Tosato, Gustavo Rohenkohl, Jarrod Robert Dowdall, Pascal Fries
2022· preprint· en· bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
affunlabeled
Split‐Brain Research
Maryse Lassonde
2005· other· en· Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About