MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Canadian parliamentary review
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

1,210 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002021
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
1,210 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 7 of 25

Labels cover 3 of 1,210 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 1,210 of 1,210 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affno abstractunlabeled
糖尿病 4d. 合併症 動脈硬化症
江草玄士
2000· article· ja· Canadian parliamentary review· Engineering
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Senate Reform: An Incremental Option
Jack Stilborn
2015· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affno abstractunlabeled
Preserving the Religious Tradition in Quebec
Bernard R. Brodeur
2006· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Reply to the rejoinder
Edmund A. Aunger
2009· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Mathematics
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
The Whip in the Wstminster System
Randy Weekes
2012· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Economics, Econometrics and Finance
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
画像 2)ミクログリアPET
島田斉, 樋口真人
2014· article· ja· Canadian parliamentary review
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
0
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Roundtable: Managing the House in Fiscally Challenging Times
Dale Graham, Bill Barisoff, Alfie MacLeod, Steve G. Peters, David Smith, Gordie Gosse +2 more
2012· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Economics, Econometrics and Finance
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
Translating the Laws of Canada: 1841-1935
Alain Otis
2005· article· en· Canadian parliamentary review· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
0
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About