MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

2,407 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
2,407 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 9 of 49

Labels cover 84 of 2,407 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 2,407 of 2,407 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
The SCOPE framework – implementing ideals of responsible research assessment
Laura Himanen, E. Conte, Marianne Gauffriau, Tanja Strøm, Baron Wolf, Elizabeth Gadd
2024· preprint· en· F1000Research· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+sts+scholarly_communication+open_science+research_integrity+insufficient_payloadconsensus · metaresearch+open_science+insufficient_payload
13
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
THE STANDARDIZED TESTING MOVEMENT: EQUITABLE OR EXCESSIVE?
Frank Nezavdal
2003· article· en· McGill Journal of Education / Revue des sciences de l'éducation de McGill· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+sts+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
13
citations
affvenuegpt · no categorygrok · no categoryopus · no categorymodels agree
Will Evaluation Prosper in the Future?
James C. McDavid, Irene Huse
2007· article· en· Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
12
citations
affvenueaboutunlabeled
The Lay of the Land: Evaluation Practice in Canada in 2009
Benoît Gauthier, Gail V. Barrington, Sandra L. Bozzo, Kaireen Chaytor, Alice Dignard, Robert Lahey +6 more
2009· article· en· Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · metaresearch
12
citations
fundno affunlabeled
Theories of Change in Reality
Andrew Koleros, Marie-Hélène Adrien, Tony Tyrrell
2024· book· en· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
12
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Ontario's Best Public Schools: 2009-2011
David R. Johnson, Robbie Brydon
2012· preprint· en· RePEc: Research Papers in Economics· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaepi_narrow+scholarly_communication+research_integrity+insufficient_payloadconsensus · insufficient_payload
12
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
The Impact Agenda
Katherine E. Smith, Justyna Bandola‐Gill, Nasar Meer, Ellen Stewart, Richard Watermeyer
2020· book· en· Policy Press eBooks· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
12
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About