MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Journal of Scholarly Publishing
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

723 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
723 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 9 of 15

Labels cover 71 of 723 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 723 of 723 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

venueno affunlabeled
MLA Regional Journals: Accountability, Innovation
Laurence Roth
2007· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
On the Author's Addendum
Sanford G. Thatcher
2008· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Business, Management and Accounting
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
They Rejected My Paper: Why?
Dah John, Norhayati Hussin, Mohd Sazili Shahibi, Linda Isaac Helda, Divine Senanu Ametefe, Abdulmalik Adozuka Aliu +1 more
2024· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Negotiating Roles and Relationships
John D. Hewitt, Robert M. Regoli
2010· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affgemma · scholarly_communicationgpt · scholarly_communicationmodels agree
The Case for Long Books
James W. Cortada
2015· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Reviews
2013· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · insufficient_payloadconsensus · none
1
citations
venueaboutno affunlabeled
The Alchemy of Turning Fiction into Truth
David Henige
2008· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Social Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Flogging a Dead Book?
Stephen James
2010· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
New Typographic Design (review)
Cope Cumpston
2008· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Project Muse and the E-Consolidation of Journals
Elizabeth W. Brown
2010· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
The Transom: ‘De Libris Incognitis’
William Savage
2004· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affgemma · scholarly_communicationgpt · scholarly_communicationmodels agree
Herding Cats: The View from the Volume and Series Editor
Cary J. Nederman
2005· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Decision Sciences
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Authorship Renounced
David Henige
2009· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Health Professions
machine prediction:candidate · research_integrityconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
When You’re Criticized
Brian Martin
2012· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Farewell Note from the Editor
Tom Radko
2016· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Medicine
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Ten Rules of Academic Writing
Stephen K. Donovan
2010· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affno abstractunlabeled
Journal Identity in the Digital Age
Bonnie Wheeler
2010· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Nursing
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
A Scholarly Book Marketing Fantasy
Bob Paul
2002· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations
venueno affunlabeled
Personalities in Publishing: Gervase Muller
Hazel Κ. Bell
2002· article· en· Journal of Scholarly Publishing· Arts and Humanities
machine prediction:candidate · scholarly_communicationconsensus · none
1
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About