MétaCan
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

621 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20002025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
621 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 9 of 13

Labels cover 4 of 621 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 621 of 621 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work (title-only); the Codex side is a distilled, calibrated classifier. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

affno abstractunlabeled
Neurosteroids and the mesocorticolimbic system
Désirée R. Seib, Daniel J. Tobiansky, John Meitzen, Stan Floresco, Kiran K. Soma
2023· review· en· Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
32
citations
afffundno abstractunlabeled
Pathogens, odors, and disgust in rodents
Martin Kavaliers, Klaus‐Peter Ossenkopp, Elena Choleris
2020· review· en· Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
31
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Some pitfalls in measuring memory in animals
Christina M. Thorpe, Claudia Jacova, Donald M. Wilkie
2004· review· en· Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · metaresearchconsensus · none
27
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Conditioned effects of kindling
Steven J. Barnes, John P. J. Pinel
2001· review· en· Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
26
citations
affno abstractunlabeled
Towards a consensus on developmental regression
Dajie Zhang, Francesco Bedogni, Sofie Boterberg, Carol Camfield, Peter Camfield, Tony Charman +28 more
2019· article· en· Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews· Neuroscience
machine prediction:candidate · noneconsensus · none
24
citations

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About