MétaCan
ENFR
Menu
Cohort builder

4,299,418 works, Canadian by any of four routes.

Every filter state is a URL; the URL is the query; the query is citable via /q/⟨hash⟩. The page, the API and the export parse the same parameters.

Export CSVExport JSONAPI query

The current cohort, streamed from the database: every work column, the machine labels, the provisional scores, and the per-row validation status. Exports are capped at 100,000 rows. Mints a permanent /q/ link for this exact query. The same filters always produce the same link, whoever asks.

Search term
Author
Year range
→
Sort
Language
Type
Field
Venue
Systematic Reviews
Topic
Retraction
Abstract
Evidence source
Study design
Label agreement
Label status

Direct Codex and Gemma labels are unvalidated and sparse. Distilled predictions cover the full frame and are also unvalidated. Choose the evidence source explicitly; absence of a direct label is never a negative label.

affaffiliation
fundfunder
venuejournal
aboutaboutness

The four routes compose: require the funder route and exclude affiliation to get the funder-only stratum no affiliation-based frame ever sees.

998 results · 1 filter active ·
Results by year
20122025
Publication date
Categories
Machine labels · sparse coverage
Evidence
Language
Type
Citations
An unlabeled work is unknown, not a negative. Label coverage is reported on every query.
998 works in the cohort · of 4,299,418page 9 of 20

Labels cover 65 of 998 works in this cohort. The rest are unlabeled, which is not a negative label: the label table is sparse today and grows as labeling rounds land.

Distilled predictions cover 998 of 998 works in this cohort. Predictions are machine_predicted_unvalidated teacher distillation outputs. Candidate is the union; consensus is the intersection.

afffundunlabeled
Protocol of a scoping review on knowledge translation competencies
Αναστασία Μαλλίδου, Pat Atherton, Liza Chan, Noreen Frisch, Stephanie Glegg, Gayle Scarrow
2017· review· en· Systematic Reviews· Health Professions
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+insufficient_payloadconsensus · metaresearch
17
citations
aboutno affunlabeled
Comparative analysis of Cochrane and non-Cochrane reviews over three decades
Mikkel Zola Andersen, Philine Zeinert, Jacob Rosenberg, Siv Fonnes
2024· article· en· Systematic Reviews· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broad+scholarly_communication+insufficient_payloadconsensus · metaresearch+insufficient_payload
17
citations
affunlabeled
Evaluating Data Abstraction Assistant, a novel software application for data abstraction during systematic reviews: protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Ian J. Saldanha, Christopher H. Schmid, Joseph Lau, Kay Dickersin, Jesse A. Berlin, Jens Jap +11 more
2016· article· en· Systematic Reviews· Decision Sciences
distilled prediction:candidate · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow+metaepi_broad+scholarly_communication+open_science+insufficient_payloadconsensus · metaresearch+metaepi_narrow
15
citations
← previousnext →

How this was built: Screen · Findings · About