MétaCan
← tous les travaux

<i>Retracted:</i> Decision Aid Reliance: A Longitudinal Field Study Involving Professional Buy‐Side Financial Analysts*

2010· article· en· 11 citations· W1575457327 sur OpenAlex· 10.1111/j.1911-3846.2010.01034.x

Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

Revue canadienneIl a paru dans une revue canadienne.

Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Dossier post-publication

Nature
Retraction
Motif
Falsification/Fabrication of Data;Investigation by Company/Institution;Misconduct - Official Investigation(s) and/or Finding(s);Misconduct by Author;
Date
12/9/2015 0:00
Signalé par OpenAlex ?
Oui

Source : Retraction Watch, jointe par DOI. OpenAlex consigne la rétractation dans is_retracted, un booléen sur un espace d'états à au moins quatre valeurs ; il ne peut donc exprimer ni une expression de préoccupation, ni une correction, ni un rétablissement, et les rapporte comme false, ce qui se lit comme « rien à signaler ».

Résumé

This study complements and extends prior decision aid (DA) research by examining the DA reliance behavior of professional buy-side financial analysts in the context of their actual work environment. A large mutual fund company provided data on buy-side analysts' earnings forecasts over the course of one year, during which forecasts were made at the end of each quarter for the following four consecutive quarters. As part of the decision process, all analysts could voluntarily access a DA to assist them in forecasting earnings. Consistent with extant DA theory, the results indicate that analysts with greater performance-contingent incentives were less likely to rely on the DA and analysts with more complex portfolios were more likely to rely on the DA. Contrary to the results of most DA research and inconsistent with extant DA theory, analysts with greater task ability relied more on the DA than analysts with lesser ability. Finally, when DA reliance was high, analysts' forecast accuracy was also high, regardless of DA accuracy. The results provide valuable insight into the use of DAs by professional decision makers and the influence of DA reliance on their judgments in light of real-world pressures and performance consequences. The theoretical and practical implications of this study call for more research into why, how, and under what conditions highly skilled knowledge workers rely on the advice of DAs.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

La notice

Revue
Contemporary Accounting Research
Thématique
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Domaine
Business, Management and Accounting
Établissements canadiens
Organismes subventionnaires
Mots-clés
CitationLibrary scienceField (mathematics)ManagementPolitical sciencePsychologyComputer scienceEconomicsMathematics
Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
oui