MétaCan
← tous les travaux

Toughness Characterization of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete: Which Standard to Use?

2004· article· en· 13 citations· W2034247034 sur OpenAlex· 10.1520/jte11901

Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

Affiliation canadienneUne personne signataire a déclaré un établissement canadien. C'est la seule voie dont dispose la base habituelle.

Le tri à trois modèles

les 1 000 travaux triés →

Les trois modèles l'ont jugé hors champ.

strate : aff_core · poids de sondage : 5595.24 (l'échantillon est stratifié ; tout taux calculé sans le poids est faux)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: medium

Comparison of concrete toughness test standards; measurement standards in materials engineering, and the 'reproducibility' language is assay-level, a polysemy trap.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

This compares concrete testing standards and measurement results, not research methods as a social or scholarly practice.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

Compares engineering materials-test standards for concrete toughness; object is construction materials testing, not research.

Résumé

Abstract The major advantage of fiber-reinforced concrete (FRC) over its plain counterpart is in its improved energy absorption capability, or ‘toughness.’ There are currently several standard test methods available to characterize the toughness of fiber-reinforced concrete, but little is known of the relationship between the toughness results they produce for a given fiber-reinforced concrete. An attempt is made here to compare the results produced by three of these techniques: ASTM C 1018, ASTM C 1399, and JSCE SF-4 for the same concrete and to assess the subjectivity encountered in toughness characterization. It was found that there is no firm and reliable correlation between these three procedures; they would rank different FRCs differently. Only a weak correlation exists between the toughness parameters generated by the C 1399 and the SF-4 standards, and the correlation is highly dependent on the fiber type. The ASTM C 1018 procedure is the least reliable of all and produces Toughness Indices and RM,N values that are very difficult to interpret.

Conservé avec la notice de tri, où il sert de preuve aux étiquettes ci-dessus.

La notice

Revue
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
Thématique
Innovative concrete reinforcement materials
Domaine
Engineering
Établissements canadiens
University of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnaires
Mots-clés
ToughnessMaterials scienceComposite materialFiberFiber-reinforced concreteCharacterization (materials science)Reinforced concrete
Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
oui