MétaCan
← tous les travaux

Retracted

2016· article· en· 1 citations· W2902254176 sur OpenAlex· 10.1097/sla.0000000000001616

Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

Affiliation canadienneUne personne signataire a déclaré un établissement canadien. C'est la seule voie dont dispose la base habituelle.

Dossier post-publication

Nature
Retraction
Motif
Error by Journal/Publisher;
Date
9/6/2017 0:00
Signalé par OpenAlex ?
Oui

Source : Retraction Watch, jointe par DOI. OpenAlex consigne la rétractation dans is_retracted, un booléen sur un espace d'états à au moins quatre valeurs ; il ne peut donc exprimer ni une expression de préoccupation, ni une correction, ni un rétablissement, et les rapporte comme false, ce qui se lit comme « rien à signaler ».

Résumé

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare the proposed complication severity score (CSS) with comprehensive complication index (CCI) using a questionnaire-based survey of experienced gastrointestinal and hepato-pancreatico-biliary surgeons. BACKGROUND: Morbidity rate has become an important outcome measure, as the mortality rates of most surgical procedures have decreased substantially. The recently developed CCI for measuring complications is a step forward in this process but has some drawbacks. We developed a new scoring system for calculating morbidity and compared it with CCI. METHODS: We designed a questionnaire with 9 scenarios wherein each scenario compared a hypothetical patient who developed a number of lower grade complications with another hypothetical patient who underwent the same surgical procedure but developed a single higher grade complication. The questionnaire was sent to 50 experienced surgeons who were asked to choose the patient who in their opinion had more severe complication. The results thus obtained were compared with the CSS and the CCI for these patients. RESULTS: Forty-nine of fifty experienced surgeons replied. Of the 9 sets of scenarios, experienced surgeons' opinion matched with CSS alone in six, CSS as well as CCI in one, and neither CSS or CCI in two scenarios. Of the total 441 responses, 281 matched with CSS while 143 matched with CCI (P = 0.0001, odds ratio: 3.7; 95% CI 2.8-4.8). CONCLUSIONS: CCI was not accurate in calculating the severity of a combination of postoperative complications. The CSS more often matched the opinion of experienced senior surgeons but requires further modifications.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

La notice

Revue
Annals of Surgery
Thématique
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Domaine
Medicine
Établissements canadiens
Object Research Systems (Canada)
Organismes subventionnaires
Mots-clés
MedicineComplicationOdds ratioSurgeryScoring systemGeneral surgeryInternal medicine
Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
oui