MétaCan
← tous les travaux

The advantages of the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) over F1 score and accuracy in binary classification evaluation

2020· article· en· 5 819 citations· W2999309192 sur OpenAlex· 10.1186/s12864-019-6413-7

Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

Affiliation canadienneUne personne signataire a déclaré un établissement canadien. C'est la seule voie dont dispose la base habituelle.
Organisme subventionnaire canadienUn organisme canadien l'a financé. Le travail peut ne porter aucune affiliation canadienne.

Résumé

Abstract Background To evaluate binary classifications and their confusion matrices, scientific researchers can employ several statistical rates, accordingly to the goal of the experiment they are investigating. Despite being a crucial issue in machine learning, no widespread consensus has been reached on a unified elective chosen measure yet. Accuracy and F 1 score computed on confusion matrices have been (and still are) among the most popular adopted metrics in binary classification tasks. However, these statistical measures can dangerously show overoptimistic inflated results, especially on imbalanced datasets. Results The Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), instead, is a more reliable statistical rate which produces a high score only if the prediction obtained good results in all of the four confusion matrix categories (true positives, false negatives, true negatives, and false positives), proportionally both to the size of positive elements and the size of negative elements in the dataset. Conclusions In this article, we show how MCC produces a more informative and truthful score in evaluating binary classifications than accuracy and F 1 score, by first explaining the mathematical properties, and then the asset of MCC in six synthetic use cases and in a real genomics scenario. We believe that the Matthews correlation coefficient should be preferred to accuracy and F 1 score in evaluating binary classification tasks by all scientific communities.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

La notice

Revue
BMC Genomics
Thématique
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Domaine
Computer Science
Établissements canadiens
Ontario Tobacco Research UnitKrembil Foundation
Organismes subventionnaires
University of Toronto
Mots-clés
Binary classificationFalse positive paradoxBinary numberFalse positives and false negativesCorrelationConfusion matrixArtificial intelligenceStatisticsPearson product-moment correlation coefficientFalse positive rateConfusionCorrelation coefficientMatthews correlation coefficientComputer scienceMachine learningPattern recognition (psychology)Data miningMathematicsSupport vector machinePsychologyArithmetic
Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
oui