MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1003154759 · doi:10.11113/mjce.v25n2.305

IMPROVEMENT OF STREAMFLOW SIMULATION FOR GAUGED SITE OF HYDROLOGICAL MODEL

2013· article· en· W1003154759 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrological Forecasting Using AI
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStreamflowHydrometeorologyHydrographEnvironmental scienceFlood forecastingHydrological modellingHydrology (agriculture)PrecipitationDrainage basinMeteorologyClimatologyGeologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents an improvement procedure for streamflow simulation at gauged site of a semi-distributed river basin model. In addition to streamflow and precipitation, meteorological observations that are not employed in the HEC-HMS model calibration are used as inputs in the procedure. Some of the available meteorological variables may be of limited values in calibrating a large range of streamflow hydrographs for obtaining the optimum state variables and parameters of a river basin model. This study presents the integration of the Bayesian regularization neural network with the HEC-HMS model to provide most accurate streamflow simulations at gauged site, for a wide range of streamflow hydrographs pertinent to the hydrometeorological conditions. The artificial neural network is capable of generating a good generalization with given hydrometeorological patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.180
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrological Forecasting Using AIFrench-language works237,207