Research Topics in Gastrointestinal Disease: A Report on the 11th Symposium
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Canadian gastrointestinal (GI) research community is a world leader in advancing our understanding of many areas of physiology and pathophysiology relevant to GI disease. These highly successful research programs have created an excellent cohort of graduate and postgraduate research trainees involved in GI research at institutions across Canada. These trainees play an instrumental role in the discoveries and new knowledge that has emerged from their laboratories. Many of them are funded by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) in collaboration with the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of Canada (CCFC), and a number of industry partners. To recognize the value of the Canadian GI trainees’ outstanding research contributions, and to promote and encourage the continued efforts of the graduate and postgraduate research trainees in basic and clinical sciences, the CAG, CHIR and CCFC held the 11th Symposium on Research Topics in GI diseases on February 22 to 23, 2012 in Montreal, Quebec (in advance of Canadian Digestive Diseases Week [CDDW]). The goal of this meeting was to provide research trainees with an opportunity to informally present their original research from diverse disciplines, to their peers and to a selection of faculty from across Canada. In this forum, trainees actively participated in the discussions of papers in an open setting. This year’s program consisted of a series of superb presentations describing cutting-edge research with 39 podium scientific presentations of basic and clinical gastroenterology-related research, covering GI development, pathogenesis of esophagogastrointestinal inflammation and healing, enteric microbiota and pathogens, including bacteria that promote cancer, and gastric ulceration, enteric nerves, and epithelial transport and barrier function. The addition of a ‘reviewer role’ provided all participants with the opportunity to review another presenter’s abstract (as assigned by the program organizers) in advance of the presentation and to be prepared to ask a question related to the abstract presentation allowing the trainees to function in the ‘session chair role’. The keynote session ‘Developing a translational research program: Perspectives from a Clinician scientist’ was presented by Dr Paul Beck. This year’s career development toolbox session focused on ‘Writing a manuscript’. Dr Catharine Walsh presented a practical talk with key tips that was followed by small group breakout sessions in which trainees were able to begin to implement some of the key points reviewed. This year the program included a combined session and opportunity for interaction with the Scholars and Gastroenterology Residents-in-Training (GRIT) attendees: ‘GI Research: What’s in it for me?’ presented by CAG’s McKenna Lecturer, Dr Richard Hunt. Similar to previous years, a major success of the meeting was that it provided a venue in which trainees could meet their peers from across Canada, develop research skills and initiate collaborations, thus developing contacts for their future research career and the future of Canadian GI research. The majority of participants rated the program as good to excellent, and commented that attendance at the meeting offered great interaction with mentors and trainees. The Research Topics meeting provides a valuable opportunity for young researchers to exchange learning. The CAG is proud to acknowledge its Benefactor Corporate Sponsors: Abbott Canada AstraZeneca Canada Inc Olympus Canada Inc Pentax Canada Inc Janssen Inc Takeda Canada Inc
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.040 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".