MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W102459858

Performance of adaptive bridge scheduling in a scatternet with a slave–slave bridge: Research Articles

2004· article· en· W102459858 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunications and Mobile Computing · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBluetooth and Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)BluetoothScatternetComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Network packetLocalityResidence time (fluid dynamics)Traffic intensityComputer networkReal-time computingTelecommunicationsWirelessEngineeringMathematicsMathematical optimization
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

End-to-end packet delays in a Bluetooth scatternet with a Slave–Slave (SS) bridge can be minimized by adjusting the bridge residence times in accordance with traffic intensity and locality. This paper presents two algorithms to do so. One of these uses a fixed value of the bridge residence time, while the other adjusts the residence time dynamically according to the instantaneous intensity of inter-piconet traffic. We discuss the performance of these algorithms and show that the adaptive algorithm offers better performance than the fixed residence time one, provided the parameters are chosen appropriately. We also consider the stability of both algorithms and show that they have comparable stability limits. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.786
Threshold uncertainty score0.476

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.089
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it