MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W104561801 · doi:10.1353/srm.2010.0027

Transport: Mobility, Anxiety, and the Romantic Poetics of Feeling

2010· article· en· W104561801 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Miranda Burgess

Bibliographic record

VenueStudies in Romanticism · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMedia, Communication, and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoeticsRomanceNarrativeFeelingEnthusiasmPassionPsychoanalysisLiteratureHistoryPoetryPsychologyPhilosophyArtTheologySocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Transport: Mobility, Anxiety, and the Romantic Poetics of Feeling Miranda Burgess (bio) Miranda Burgess University of British Columbia, Canada Miranda Burgess Miranda Burgess is Associate Professor of English at the Unviersity of British Columbia and the author of British Fiction and the Production of Social Order, 1740–1830. She is finishing Romantic Transport, 1790–1830, a book that examines the technologies and anxieties of mobility at the turn of the nineteenth century in relation to the history of feeling, the poetics of the figure, and experiments in narrative form. Her next project is a history of the idea that art moves those who encounter it. Footnotes I would like to thank the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada for financial support of the project to which this essay belongs. 1. Adela Pinch, Strange Fits of Passion: Epistemologies of Emotion, Hume to Austen (Stanford: Stanford UP, 1996) 3, 10. 2. Thomas Pfau, Romantic Moods: Paranoia, Trauma, and Melancholy, 1790–1840 (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2005) 4. Subsequently cited in the text. 3. Julie Ellison, Cato’s Tears and the Making of Anglo-American Emotion (Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1999) 10, 193; Martha Nussbaum, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of Emotions (Oxford: Oxford UP, 2001) 31–32, 658. 4. Anthony Ashley Cooper, Third Earl of Shaftesbury, A Letter Concerning Enthusiasm, in Characteristics of Men, Manners, Opinions, Times, ed. Lawrence E. Klein (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1999) 10. Subsequently cited in the text. 5. David Hume, Treatise of Human Nature, ed. L. A. Selby-Bigge, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Oxford UP, 1978) 316. Subsequently cited in the text. 6. Adam Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments, ed. Knud Haakonssen (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002) 13. Subsequently cited in the text. 7. For Hume 576, sympathetic feeling proceeds from visible signs to a deduction of causes to “such a lively idea of the passion as is presently converted into the passion itself.” 8. Gillian Russell and Clara Tuite, eds., Romantic Sociability: Social Networks and Literary Culture in Britain, 1770–1840 (Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2003). 9. Paul de Man, “The Rhetoric of Temporality,” in Blindness and Insight: Essays in the Rhetoric of Contemporary Criticism, 2nd ed. (Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1983) 191, 197, 207. Subsequently cited in the text. 10. De Man, “Metaphor (Second Discourse),” in Allegories of Reading: Figural Language in Rousseau, Nietzsche, Rilke, and Proust (New Haven: Yale UP, 1979) 151. Subsequently cited in the text. 11. See Brian Massumi, Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation (Durham, NC: Duke UP, 2002) 29–30. 12. Among the many rich and promising existing schemas for distinguishing between feelings and affects, this essay follows Brian Massumi’s development, in Parables 23–45, of a Spinozist model in which affects, as “intensities” existing as rich fields of potential, become feelings when they enter the related spheres of volition, cognition, experience, and language, which is also to say subjectivity. 13. “Transport” experienced a brief vogue in the late 1980s, perhaps in consequence of the psychologist Victor Nell’s Lost in a Book: The Psychology of Reading for Pleasure (New Haven: Yale UP, 1988), in which the term is repeatedly invoked to name the imaginative participation in scenes Nell theorizes as critical to readerly enjoyment. Karen Swann’s “Public Transport: Adventuring on Wordsworth’s Salisbury Plain,” in ELH 55.4 (1988): 811, argues for the “creaks and jolts, shrills and iron clangs, [and]… insults… to one’s amour propre” that result from the experience of sympathy, or “transubjectivity,” Wordsworth depicts between Sailor and Female Vagrant, but these reminders of a material substrate for vagrant affect serve chiefly as a metonym for publicity (as in a public conveyance such as the stagecoach). David Marshall, in The Surprising Effects of Sympathy: Marivaux, Diderot, Rousseau, and Mary Shelley (Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1988) 5, ascribes to several writers of the long eighteenth century, including Mary Shelley, “an investment in the concept of sympathy as a transport that would transcend the distance and difference between people, allowing an exchange between parts, characters, and persons,” but does not elaborate on the material conditions of such an exchange. More recently, “The Transport of the Novel,” the title of Deidre Lynch...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0060.034
Scholarly communication0.0080.006
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStudies in RomanticismSame topicMedia, Communication, and EducationFrench-language works237,207