Dynamic concept maps as knowledge representation tools for learning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this thesis is to extend research on educational node-link displays with animated multimedia presentation. The thesis focuses on an empirical study of the learning effectiveness of a dynamic concept map synchronized with audio presentation. 133 undergraduates, who were randomly assigned to four groups, participated in this experiment. The two experimental groups viewed plain and graphically enhanced concept maps that were semantically equivalent to the narration. These animated concept maps were synchronized with the audio track. The two control groups viewed text versions of the narration, one synchronized with the audio track and another version preceding the audio track. All visual presentations were incremental and cumulative. Both map groups outperformed the text groups on a free recall test. The plain map group outperformed the text groups on a comprehension test. Implications of this work are discussed with respect to cognitive and multimedia theories of learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it