MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W114466135 · doi:10.63898/odyi3392

EFFECTS OF THE DECEMBER 26, 2004 SUMATRA EARTHQUAKE AND TSUNAMI ON PHYSICAL INFRASTRUCTURE

2005· article· en· W114466135 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueISET Journal of Earthquake Technology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEarthquake and Tsunami Effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSeismologyGeologyTsunami earthquakeForeshockAftershock

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A devastating earthquake and the resulting tsunami hit coastal areas of Indian Ocean on December 26, 2004. A team of Canadian engineers conducted a reconnaissance in Thailand and Indonesia. Their findings are presented in the paper in terms of performance of buildings, bridges, coastal structures and other physical infrastructure. It was observed that non-engineered reinforced concrete structures, low-rise timber frames and unreinforced masonry buildings suffered extensive damage due to hydrodynamic pressures generated by tsunami and impact forces induced by floating debris. Banda Aceh, Indonesia suffered extensive damage due to seismic excitations. A large number of non-engineered and engineered reinforced concrete frame buildings experienced partial or total collapse. A number of 3 to 5 story engineered reinforced concrete government buildings and shopping centers were damaged due to lack of proper seismic design practices. The engineering significance of disaster is presented in the paper with observations made during the reconnaissance visit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.806
Threshold uncertainty score0.888

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it