Adaptive appearance model tracking for still-to-video face recognition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Systems for still-to-video face recognition (FR) seek to detect the presence of target individuals based on reference facial still images or mug-shots. These systems encounter several challenges in video surveillance applications due to variations in capture conditions (e.g., pose, scale, illumination, blur and expression) and to camera inter-operability. Beyond these issues, few reference stills are available during enrollment to design representative facial models of target individuals. Systems for still-to-video FR must therefore rely on adaptation, multiple face representation, or synthetic generation of reference stills to enhance the intra-class variability of face models . Moreover, many FR systems only match high quality faces captured in video, which further reduces the probability of detecting target individuals. Instead of matching faces captured through segmentation to reference stills, this paper exploits Adaptive Appearance Model Tracking (AAMT) to gradually learn a track-face-model for each individual appearing in the scene. The Sequential Karhunen–Loeve technique is used for online learning of these track-face-models within a particle filter-based face tracker. Meanwhile, these models are matched over successive frames against the reference still images of each target individual enrolled to the system, and then matching scores are accumulated over several frames for robust spatiotemporal recognition. A target individual is recognized if scores accumulated for a track-face-model over a fixed time surpass some decision threshold. The main advantage of AAMT over traditional still-to-video FR systems is the greater diversity of facial representation that may be captured during operations, and this can lead to better discrimination for spatiotemporal recognition. Compared to state-of-the-art adaptive biometric systems, the proposed method selects facial captures to update an individual׳s face model more reliably because it relies on information from tracking. Simulation results obtained with the Chokepoint video dataset indicate that the proposed method provides a significantly higher level of performance compared state-of-the-art systems when a single reference still per individual is available for matching. This higher level of performance is achieved when the diverse facial appearances that are captured in video through AAMT correspond to that of reference stills.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".