MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W115409629 · doi:10.1177/215416470103600208

Effects of Exercise Frequency on Stereotypic Behaviors of Children with Developmental Disabilities

2001· article· en· W115409629 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEducation and training in mental retardation and developmental disabilities · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicBehavioral and Psychological Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyAudiologyPhysical medicine and rehabilitationPhysical therapyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two exercise treatments were implemented, differentiated by frequency. The single frequency exercise treatment consisted of one daily ten minute walk/jog session, while the multiple frequency treatment involved three ten minute walk/jog sessions per day. Stereotypic behaviors were observed prior to the exercise sessions, as well as immediately following exercise. Subjects demonstrate a mean reduction of 51.6% in the single frequency condition. These data confirm the results of past research following a single bout of exercise. However, these positive results are usually short-lived. Thus, the mean reduction of 58.9% following the multiple frequency condition can be viewed as more effective than the single frequency condition because the reduction was maintained throughout different periods of the day. Use of a multiple frequency exercise treatment informally revealed an interaction between exercise and environment with regard to stereotypic behaviors. Observation in the classroom suggested that as the structure of the classroom increased, stereotypic behaviors decreased. Thus, exercise combined with a structured classroom is likely to yield an optimal decrease in stereotypic behaviors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.659

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it