MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1210901285 · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.305

On-line Supply Chain Scheduling Problem with Capacity Limited Vehicles

2015· article· en· W1210901285 on OpenAlexaff
Wenjun Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIFAC-PapersOnLine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJob shop schedulingComputer scienceScheduling (production processes)Mathematical optimizationSupply chainCompetitive analysisRobustness (evolution)Operations researchMathematicsComputer networkUpper and lower boundsBusinessRouting (electronic design automation)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper studies the on-line supply chain scheduling problem for single machine with multiple customers under the constraint of the unlimited number of vehicles but limited vehicle capacity. The customers place their orders on-line, which means that no information of future jobs is known beforehand. The jobs are processed on a single machine and then delivered to the customers by vehicles. Every vehicle can only contain the jobs of the same customer and every batch has the same fixed cost. The objective of the scheduling is to minimize the total makespan and the total delivery cost. Such a problem is called on-line problem. An on-line algorithm for the problem is designed, which is proved to be 2 + 2-competitive. The paper also presents a case study for demonstrating the robustness and efficiency of the algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0030.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIFAC-PapersOnLineSame topicScheduling and Optimization AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207