MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Responses to a recurring admission alert system

2011· article· en· W123711388 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEmergency Nurse · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHealthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Canadian institutionsUniversity of the Fraser ValleyBC Cancer Agency
FundersBC Cancer AgencyImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
KeywordsEmergency departmentMedical emergencyService (business)Focus (optics)Work (physics)MedicineFocus groupHealthcare systemNursingHealth careBusinessEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents and discusses a service improvement project to introduce an automated alert system that notifies a nominated healthcare worker that a cancer patient has attended the emergency department (ED). The recurring admission patient alert (RAPA) system was introduced in one trust and alerts were sent and monitored for 16 weeks. During this period 155 alerts were received by eight clinical nurse specialists (CNSs) representing nine different tumour sites. At the same time a focus group was held with four of the CNSs. The RAPA system demonstrated a decrease in mean length of stay. The focus group highlighted that the system was integrated into the working lives of the CNSs. Further work is required to define the CNS role in the ED and also to share and spread the software to other specialties.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.498

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.360
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it