MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1241628180

A rational approach to exciting developments in space law

2009· article· en· W1241628180 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Janice Denoncourt

Bibliographic record

VenueNottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpace exploration and regulation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLawSpace lawSpace (punctuation)Subject (documents)ScholarshipPolitical scienceSociologyLibrary scienceOuter spaceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

See, eg, S Frisby, A preliminary analysis of pre-packaged administrations -Report to The Association of Business Recovery ProfessionalsAugust 2007; S Frisby, ''The pre-pack progression: latest empirical findings'' [2008] Insolvency Intelligence 154; and S Frisby, ''The Second Chance Culture and Beyond: Some Observations on the Pre-Pack Contribution'' [2009] Law and Financial Markets Review 242. 4 See

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.087

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0070.060
Scholarly communication0.0140.018
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0100.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNottingham Trent University's Institutional Repository (Nottingham Trent Repository)Same topicSpace exploration and regulationFrench-language works237,207